A warehouse receipt is a written acknowledgement by a
warehouseman that he has received and held certain goods therein described in
store for the person to whom it is issued.
A warehouseman is the person lawfully engaged in the
business of storing goods for compensation for such service.
To whom delivered:
Upon demand made by the holder of the receipt or depositor
provided such demand is accompanied by:
1. an offer to satisfy warehouseman's lien;
2. an offer to surrender receipt; and
3. a readiness and willingness to sign. (Sec. 8)
Kinds:
Negotiable - if deliverable to order or to bearer;
Non-negotiable - if deliverable to a specified person it
must be stamped, otherwise warehouseman is liable to person believing it to be
negotiable.
Conflicting Claims - remedy of a warehouseman is to file an
action for interpleader.
Warehouseman's Lien - this is effective on the goods
deposited which operate as a retaining lien until his charges are paid. The
lien is lost (a) by surrender of goods, and (b) refusal to deliver goods when
demand is proper.
Remedies Available to Warehouseman to Enforce his Warehouseman's
Lien:
1. To refuse to deliver the goods until his lien is
satisfied.
2. To sell the goods and apply the proceeds thereof to the
value of the lien.
3. To institute an action for collection judicially.
Lawful Reasons or Justifications for a warehouseman's
refusal to Deliver the Goods:
1. The conditions prescribed in Sec. 8 of Art. 2137 was not
satisfied by the holder of the receipt.
2. The warehouseman has legal title in himself on the goods
either through transfer or satisfaction of warehouseman's lien.
3. The warehouseman has legally set-up the title or right of
third persons as lawful defense for non-delivery of goods.
4. The warehouseman has a lien valid against the person claiming
the goods.
5. The failure was not due to any fault on the part of the warehouseman
such as calamity and fortuitous event.
Distinction between Negotiable Instrument and Negotiable
Warehouse Receipt
1. as to alteration – negotiable instrument becomes null and
void while negotiable warehouse receipt is still valid but enforceable only in
accordance with its original tenor.
2. if originally payable to bearer - in negotiable instrument
it will always remain payable to bearer regardless of the way it is endorsed,
whether specially or in blank while in negotiable warehouse receipt if it is
payable to bearer endorsed specially, it will be converted into receipt
deliverable to order and can only be negotiated further by endorsement and
delivery.
3. as to rights of holder - in negotiable instrument, a
holder in due course may be able to obtain the title better than which the
party negotiated the instrument to him had, while in negotiable warehouse
receipt, the endorsee, even if holder in due course, obtains only such title as
the person negotiating had over the goods.
No comments:
Post a Comment